The hip-hop mogul, born Curtis Jackson, has filed a lawsuit against Tompkins, the mother of his eldest son, Marquise Jackson, accusing her of breaching a 2007 agreement that gave his company, G-Unit Books, exclusive rights to her life story.
According to court documents obtained by AllHipHop, the deal prohibits Tompkins from profiting off her personal experiences without G-Unit’s approval. Now, Fif’s legal team claims she’s violated that deal — and they’re demanding at least $1 million in damages.
The Battle Over Her “Life Story”
In 2007, Shaniqua Tompkins signed a contract granting G-Unit Books “unconditional, irrevocable, exclusive, and perpetual” rights to her name, likeness, and life story.
In exchange, she reportedly received $80,000 upfront and the promise of future royalties if her story was ever turned into a book, series, or film.
More Read
The agreement was also designed to prevent Tompkins from “exploiting their shared history for personal gain,” according to G-Unit’s legal filing.
But Fif’s team now argues that Tompkins has done just that — reigniting public interest in her past with 50 and their son Marquise, and using the attention to share her side of the story through interviews and viral social media posts.
Allegations Fly as Lawsuit Heats Up
The lawsuit highlights a series of interviews and videos in which Tompkins speaks about her turbulent relationship with the rapper. Among her claims:
- That 50 Cent physically assaulted her during her pregnancy in 1996.
- That she endured verbal and physical abuse throughout their time together.
G-Unit’s attorney, Reena Jain, stated:
“Tompkins knowingly violated the agreement and even acknowledged its existence as she continued sharing her story. The damage extends far beyond lost income. The exclusivity of the deal was its true value.”
The legal team also points to a viral social media post tied to the high-profile Diddy trial, claiming Tompkins used the renewed spotlight to monetize her narrative — despite G-Unit holding the rights.
What 50 Cent Wants From the Court
50’s lawsuit seeks:
✅ A court order blocking Tompkins from further promoting or profiting from her life story.
✅ At least $1 million in damages for the alleged breach.
✅ Reimbursement of legal fees and “additional relief” deemed appropriate by the court.
The 2007 contract also contains an indemnification clause, meaning Tompkins could be on the hook for any financial losses resulting from her alleged actions.
Tompkins Silent Amid Legal Storm
As of now, Shaniqua Tompkins hasn’t responded publicly to the lawsuit.
The legal battle marks yet another chapter in the long-running tension between her and 50 Cent. Their rocky relationship has often played out in the public eye, with their son Marquise also caught in the middle of past disputes.
For his part, 50 has been vocal about protecting his image and intellectual property. Sources close to the rapper suggest he purchased the rights to Tompkins’ story not only for future projects but also to “control the narrative.”
“His concerns,” Jain added, “have now been realized.”
What’s Next?
It remains to be seen how Tompkins will respond to the lawsuit. Legal experts say her defense may hinge on whether the 2007 agreement is still enforceable nearly two decades later.
This case could set a precedent for how celebrity “life story” rights are handled in the age of viral content and social media monetization.
???? What do you think about 50 Cent suing over his ex’s life story? Was he right to secure the rights in the first place?
???? Drop your thoughts below and stay tuned for more tea on this brewing legal drama!
