Diddy Demands Bail: Says He’s Locked Up for “Being a Swinger”
Music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs is fighting hard to get out of jail before his October 3 sentencing — and his legal team is making one wild argument: he’s the only man in America behind bars for hiring male escorts for threesomes.
That’s the jaw-dropping claim at the center of Diddy’s latest bail motion, filed by high-powered defense attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Teny Geragos, who say the charges he was convicted of are outdated, overblown, and rooted in moral panic rather than criminal intent.
Convicted But Not Sentenced — Yet Still Locked Up
Diddy is currently being held in federal custody after being convicted on two counts under the Mann Act, a century-old law originally passed in 1910 to combat prostitution and human trafficking across state lines.
While he was acquitted of more serious charges — including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking — prosecutors successfully argued he violated the Mann Act by paying for travel for sex-related acts.
More Read
Now, with sentencing still two months away, Diddy’s team says it’s unjust to keep him locked up, especially when most defendants facing similar charges remain free on bail until sentencing.
“He Was a Swinger, Not a Sex Trafficker”
In the newly filed court docs obtained by TMZ, Diddy’s defense team paints a very different picture of the scandalous accusations that have rocked the entertainment world.
They argue that Diddy was not exploiting women, but simply engaging in a consensual swinger lifestyle with his longtime girlfriends — including Cassie and a woman identified in court only as “Jane.”
“He hired professional male escorts — none of them were minors — to have sex with his girlfriend,” the motion reads. “This is not trafficking. This is a consensual adult relationship.”
The attorneys emphasized that Diddy never personally engaged in sex with the male escorts. They say the media and prosecution twisted the narrative to make it look like something far more sinister than it was.
The Mann Act — A Law From Another Era?
Diddy’s legal team didn’t stop there. They called out the Mann Act itself, claiming it’s a relic of a bygone era.
“This law was passed 115 years ago, in June 1910,” they note, arguing that today’s society has dramatically evolved in how it views adult sexual behavior, especially involving open relationships, kinks, and consensual non-monogamy.
They believe the charges weaponized old-fashioned views about sexuality and morality to criminalize behavior that is widely accepted today in private adult relationships.
Why Diddy Was Denied Bail in the First Place
Back in July, just hours after the guilty verdict was read, Judge Arun Subramanian denied Diddy’s initial bail request — declaring him a “danger to the community.”
The judge cited Diddy’s past violent behavior, including high-profile incidents involving Cassie, whose 2016 hotel beating video was played in full for the jury, and a more recent altercation with “Jane” in June 2024.
While his lawyers didn’t shy away from the facts, they tried to minimize the scope.
“Diddy has not been violent since 2018, aside from the isolated incident in June with Jane,” the defense argues in the latest motion.
New Bail Offer: $50 Million, House Arrest, and Full Surveillance
In a dramatic new proposal, Diddy is now offering a massive $50 million bond, secured by his Florida estate and co-signed by three wealthy individuals deemed “financially responsible.”
But that’s not all.
If granted bail, Diddy says he’s willing to:
- Stay confined to his Miami mansion
- Surrender his passport
- Limit his travel to the Southern District of Florida and Southern District of New York
- Submit to electronic monitoring
- Agree to home detention
- Enter mental health and substance abuse treatment
- Allow 24/7 private security
- Report regularly to the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency
“If the court wants to add additional conditions, we won’t object,” the defense team wrote.
This latest move shows just how desperate Diddy is to avoid spending another day behind bars as he awaits judgment.
A Legacy in Shambles
Once hailed as a visionary music mogul, entrepreneur, and cultural icon, Diddy is now watching his empire collapse under the weight of scandal and legal trouble.
Brands have distanced themselves. Business partnerships have crumbled. And longtime fans are divided — some defending him, others turning away.
“The damage is done, even if he walks free,” one music exec told Billboard. “This isn’t just about jail time. It’s about public perception. And that’s changed forever.”
Prosecutors Still Opposed to Bail
As of now, the judge hasn’t ruled on the new bail package. But prosecutors aren’t backing down.
In prior filings, they’ve strongly opposed any early release, arguing Diddy is manipulative, dangerous, and influential enough to tamper with witnesses or obstruct justice if allowed to go home.
Fans React Online: “Is This Real Life?”
Social media exploded after news broke of Diddy’s latest bail request and his claims of being locked up for “hiring escorts.”
💬 “I’ve seen it all now. Diddy’s lawyers really said he’s in jail for being kinky.” — @RealityTVRewind
💬 “Swinger lifestyle ain’t illegal, but this whole case is messy AF.” — @HipHopTeaRoom
💬 “That $50M bail offer is wild. But I guess you pay to play.” — @NYLegalWatchdog
What’s Next for Diddy?
Diddy is scheduled to be sentenced on October 3, 2025, and the outcome could be life-changing. If the judge agrees with prosecutors, the music mogul could face years behind bars — even though his team insists the conduct in question was consensual and nonviolent (mostly).
Whether or not he gets bail, this case is far from over — and the public is watching every move.
💬 Your Turn: Should Diddy Be Granted Bail?
Was Diddy unfairly punished for a lifestyle choice? Or do you think the judge made the right call in keeping him locked up?
👉 Drop your thoughts in the comments below
📲 Share this story with your crew
🔔 Follow TPR for exclusive updates on Diddy’s sentencing
