Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO Sir Lucian Grainge is calling Drake’s recent accusations “ridiculous,” after the rapper claimed Grainge orchestrated a scheme to hurt him when UMG released Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, Not Like Us.
In a written declaration obtained Thursday, Grainge shot down the claim, emphasizing that his role as head of a multibillion-dollar music empire spans nearly 200 markets worldwide, leaving him far too busy to meddle in day-to-day operations like approving singles, album artwork, or music videos.
“Groundless and Ridiculous”
Grainge stresses that he had zero involvement in the release of Kendrick’s track. “It was Interscope Records, a UMG subsidiary, that finalized and released the record,” the CEO stated.
He also addressed the logic behind Drake’s claim, writing that to suggest he intentionally sabotaged one of the company’s biggest artists after investing hundreds of millions of dollars into his career simply makes no sense.
“I had never heard the recording ‘Not Like Us’ until after it was released to the world,” Grainge added.

The CEO notes that while he’s used to facing personal attacks from UMG opponents in legal battles, this allegation is particularly egregious given the company’s scope and his responsibilities.
Drake’s Legal Maneuvering
Drake recently filed a request asking UMG to produce any documents or communications that might show Grainge’s involvement in Kendrick’s diss track rollout. The rapper argues that the timing and release could suggest some form of internal sabotage, though Grainge vehemently denies any connection.
Legal insiders point out that Drake’s move is likely strategic, aiming to uncover internal UMG documents that might bolster his claims — even if Grainge had no direct role in the track’s release.
The Stakes in Hip-Hop’s Biggest Feud
This latest development lands squarely in the middle of a long-standing hip-hop feud. Drake and Kendrick Lamar have had strained relations for years, with diss tracks and subtle jabs peppered throughout their respective catalogs. Not Like Us became a lightning rod, reigniting debates among fans and critics over the beef’s authenticity and impact.
Grainge’s response makes it clear: while he’s the captain of one of the world’s largest music ships, he’s not navigating the rap battlefield personally.
UMG’s Position in the Music World
As CEO, Grainge oversees a music empire with a portfolio that spans pop, hip-hop, rock, and global markets, handling hundreds of artists and billions in revenue. From this vantage point, track-specific releases fall under individual labels like Interscope, rather than the CEO’s direct oversight.
“I am tasked with ensuring the company thrives across markets, not micromanaging the creative decisions of individual artists,” Grainge said.
His statement underscores a broader tension in the music industry: as labels grow into massive conglomerates, artists sometimes attribute operational or release decisions to top executives, even when those leaders are far removed from day-to-day creative operations.
Fan and Industry Reactions
Fans and insiders quickly weighed in online, with some calling Drake’s allegations “overreaching” while others questioned UMG’s influence over its subsidiaries. Social media is buzzing with reactions:
- “Grainge’s got a point — he’s running the whole damn company!”
- “Drake really thinks the CEO personally approved a diss track? Come on.”
- “This feud just got corporate.”
Industry analysts point out that legal battles between artists and labels are often as much about public perception and leverage as they are about actual wrongdoing. Grainge’s statement aims to protect UMG’s reputation while keeping his personal involvement out of the narrative.
What’s Next?
The court will ultimately determine whether any documents exist that could support Drake’s claims, but Grainge’s clear-cut statement sets the tone: he had nothing to do with Kendrick Lamar’s diss track release.
This case highlights the delicate intersection of hip-hop feuds, corporate oversight, and legal strategy, with Grainge reminding the public and the court that a CEO’s responsibilities don’t include playing referee in rap beefs.
Takeaway:
- Lucian Grainge denies any involvement in Kendrick Lamar’s Not Like Us release.
- Drake seeks UMG documents to support allegations of sabotage.
- The dispute shines a light on the growing tension between artists’ expectations and label operations.
Stay tuned to The Pop Radar for exclusive updates on Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
What do you think — is this just a legal strategy, or is there more to the Drake-Kendrick feud behind the scenes? Drop your thoughts in the comments below!









