Megan Thee Stallion’s ongoing legal fight with Texas blogger Milagro Gramz has taken a new twist. The rapper’s legal team is now seeking to have DJ Akademiks questioned further in court, as part of her 2024 lawsuit accusing Gramz—whose real name is Milagro Cooper—of deliberately spreading false and damaging claims online.
The suit alleges that Gramz coordinated with Tory Lanez, who is serving a ten-year sentence in California for the 2020 shooting of Megan. According to Megan’s lawyers, Gramz was financially incentivized to publish misleading narratives and that the effort was part of a broader campaign orchestrated to sway public perception against the Houston star.
The Role of the Leaked Forensic Report
At the heart of the case is a confidential forensic report linked to the gun used in the 2020 shooting. Originally sealed and not intended for public disclosure, the report surfaced online in 2022, raising questions and skepticism about Megan’s account of the incident.
Megan’s legal team argues that both Gramz and DJ Akademiks (Livingston Allen) played a key role in circulating the sensitive material. The report’s appearance online, they maintain, was part of a coordinated effort to manipulate public opinion against her.
DJ Akademiks’ Initial Testimony
Akademiks was first questioned on August 22, but his responses were reportedly limited. He invoked journalistic protections, refusing to disclose his sources or explain how the report came into his possession.
“I will never reveal who provided the material unless a judge requires it,” Akademiks stated during the deposition, highlighting the ongoing tension between journalistic confidentiality and Megan’s legal team’s demand for transparency.
Megan’s Legal Team Seeks Court Intervention
Frustrated by the lack of clarity, Megan’s attorneys have filed a motion in New Jersey to compel Akademiks to provide more detailed testimony. They argue that understanding how the sealed forensic report leaked into the public sphere is crucial to proving their claims against Gramz and exposing any coordination with Lanez.
As of now, the court has not issued a ruling, leaving open the question of whether Akademiks will be forced to reveal additional information.
Why This Case Matters
The lawsuit underscores the challenges artists face in the age of social media, where misinformation and online narratives can spread rapidly, impacting reputations and careers. Megan’s legal team is determined to hold those responsible accountable, emphasizing that deliberate misinformation campaigns—especially those financially motivated—cannot go unchecked.
For fans and observers, the case also provides a rare glimpse into the complex intersection of celebrity, legal accountability, and the power of online influence.
The Pop Radar Take
Megan Thee Stallion is not backing down. By pressing to question DJ Akademiks further, she is sending a message: those who spread falsehoods and manipulate public perception will face legal scrutiny. The outcome of this motion could have wide-reaching implications for how confidential information is handled in high-profile cases—and how journalists and influencers engage with it.
Bottom Line:
The Megan Thee Stallion vs. Milagro Gramz case continues to evolve, now with DJ Akademiks in the spotlight. Fans and media alike are watching closely, as this legal battle highlights the ongoing struggle between truth, influence, and accountability in the celebrity world.
